Life cycle assessment · openLCA 2.5 · ecoinvent 3
Electric vs. petrol cars: when does the EV win?
A cradle-to-use life cycle assessment of a battery electric vehicle (BEV) and a petrol car (ICE), each driven 150,000 km over 12 years. The EV is charged on three very different grids: nuclear-heavy France, coal- and gas-heavy Germany, and mixed Hungary. All results come from ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H).
Lifetime impact by life-cycle stage
Choose an impact category. Each bar splits one vehicle's lifetime impact into manufacturing and energy supply (fuel for the ICE, charging electricity for the EVs).
View as table
The climate break-even point
The EV starts behind because building its battery adds emissions. Every kilometre on a cleaner energy source then closes the gap. The crossing point is where the EV has paid back its extra manufacturing emissions.
Manufacturing emissions happen at km 0. Energy-supply emissions are spread evenly over the distance driven, using each scenario's lifetime result divided by 150,000 km.
Better or worse than the petrol car?
Each EV's lifetime impact compared with the ICE in every ReCiPe category. ■ Blue means lower than the ICE (better); ■ red means higher (worse).
Key findings
Model assumptions
Baseline parameters (Del Duce, Gauch & Althaus, 2016), modelled in openLCA 2.5 with ecoinvent 3 cut-off data. The system boundary is cradle to use phase; end of life is excluded.
| Parameter | Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Car lifetime | 12 | years |
| Lifetime distance | 150,000 | km |
| Battery capacity | 60 | kWh |
| Battery mass per kWh | 6 | kg/kWh |
| BEV energy use | 18 | kWh / 100 km |
| Charging efficiency | 90 | % |
| ICE fuel use | 6.5 | L / 100 km |
| Car mass | 1,500 | kg |
How it's calculated
This Python script reads the openLCA exports in Results/, splits each result into life-cycle stages, checks that the stages add back up to the totals, and writes the JSON this page uses.
analysis/build_results.pyOpen on GitHub →Loading…